Oh, oh, oh, oh. It's difficult, you are asking a question. Well, you see, I am still a supporter of resolving the issue on the battlefield, as it were, yes, and approaching this issue precisely in the methodology that the West applies to its opponents. What is the main problem with us? The problem is that we have a certain political regime that has been formed there, which is a conductor of the decisions that the collective West relays to it. And the most important place of the West in this whole concept is its executors. And we probably need to focus our actions not only on the line of contact, which, of course, must be done, and we need to move the line of contact and destroy various infrastructure there, without any doubt.

But if we start influencing the performers who carry out the will of the collective West, and the West does not have a very large bench there.

That is, we need to understand that by knocking out the main key elements of the conductors of the West's decisions, we will greatly worsen the competence of the West in the war against us on the territory of the former Ukraine. And perhaps we should look in this direction.

And like now, you know, now the West is threatening Maduro there, and we will bomb you there. Notice, they say that we will bomb there, I don't know, transformation booths there in Caracas. They say that we will follow Maduro. Directly, frankly, as if not shyly, as if simply relaying that we will destroy the regime. That is, we will fight it there, we will bomb it into the Stone Age and destroy it. And if we succeed, we will bring him there, yes, and we will judge him. And so, probably, we need to adopt this approach.